Touching the Void in Our Lives
originally published in The Chronicle of Higher Education, 13
September 2004
Mikita Brottman and David Sterritt
In the first act of Othello, the Moor tells Desdemona's father how he
won her heart by regaling her with stories of his thrilling adventures
-- of "most disastrous chances,/Of moving accidents by flood and
field;/Of hair-breadth scapes i' the imminent deadly breach."
Desdemona quickly came to love him "for the dangers [he] had pass'd,"
and she's not alone in her appetite for tales of marvelous survival
feats. These days, though, we prefer our adventure stories -- like
everything else, it seems -- to be excessive and overblown, equivalent
to the gluttonous "Extreme Gulp" soft drink you can purchase at a
nearby convenience store. Brave as they were, the exploits undergone by
many adventurers of Othello's caliber -- Lawrence of Arabia, Sir Edmund
Hillary, and so on -- were often recounted in their own day with a
sense of dignity, even modesty. Those qualities have now been replaced
by the extremer-than-thou braggadocio of this month's ESPN-broadcast X
Games X.
In today's popular culture, "extreme" is the new mundane. It's
everywhere -- from Extreme History With Roger Daltrey on the History
Channel to Weather Extreme on the Discovery Channel. There's a European
cable venue called the Extreme Sports Network, ready for U.S.
broadcasts as soon as the starting pistol sounds. And don't forget
Extreme Make-over, the ABC series about the miracles of plastic surgery.
At the movies, this trend has taken the form of increasingly frequent
releases about daredevil stunts, perilous near-disasters, and
terrifying battles between humanity and the elements. The current spate
started in 1998 with Everest, a documentary about scaling the mountain,
narrated by Liam Neeson and shot in the giant-screen IMAX process,
itself a kind of extreme cinema. Soon came the 2000 documentary
Endurance: Shackleton's Legendary Antarctic Expedition, also narrated
by the intrepid Neeson, and last year's docudrama Touching the Void,
about two mountaineers' near-death experience while climbing a
previously unscaled peak in the Peruvian Andes. Other recent arrivals
include Step Into Liquid (2003), a documentary about surfing in every
imaginable locale, and this summer's Riding Giants, another Endless
Summer spinoff. Open Water, a reality-based story of two scuba divers
abandoned in a shark-infested sea, opens this month.
On the fiction front, examples include the 2002 thriller Extreme Ops,
pitting extreme-sports aficionados against terrorists, and the 2001
comedy Extreme Days, crossing the teen-pic genre with far-out
skateboarding, snowboarding, and the like.
It's easy to dismiss such movies as superficial, audience-pleasing
spectacle, but clearly more is going on here. The most resonant of
these films take as their theme the resilience of the human spirit when
faced with apparently imminent death.
Touching the Void, for instance, tells how the real-life climber Joe
Simpson, left for dead in a mountain crevasse, made an unimaginably
arduous trek toward his base camp -- sometimes delirious with pain from
a broken leg -- without even knowing whether his companions would still
be there to keep what was left of him alive. Open Water is less
visually extravagant but similarly harrowing to watch, as two
vacationing scuba divers discover their tourist group has returned to
port without them, stranding them amid sharks, stingrays, agonizing
thirst, and the hazards of hypothermia. Graeme Revell's music score
offers a telling clue to the filmmakers' intentions -- combining a
mysterious aura, suiting the uncertainty of the protagonists' fate,
with a mystical one, suggesting that the direness of their state puts
them into uncanny contact with some kind of "beyond" that necessarily
is undefined.
The growing interest in films about extreme situations doesn't mean
more of us are hang gliding, bungee jumping, or white-water rafting in
our spare time. On the contrary, social-science experts tell us we
compose a more passive and sedentary society than ever before -- our
labors easier, our dwellings more comfortable, our bodies more
protected from war and pestilence thanks to designer weaponry and
high-tech medicine. With the Internet letting us order everything from
diapers to death certificates online, society's more privileged members
now find the very notion of venturing into the outside world more an
option than a necessity.
In films like Open Water and Touching the Void extreme perils are
presented as both terrifying mishaps and opportunities for feats of
bravery and control. What's missing from such movies are serious
thoughts about the ethical questions they raise, some of which are
vividly described by Jon Krakauer in his 1997 book Into Thin Air, about
an ill-fated Mt. Everest expedition. There he argues that today's
corporate-sponsored climbs are largely commercialized ventures
available to anyone who comes up with the cash to pay for them,
regularly leaving the slopes strewn with waste, refuse, even corpses.
Krakauer tells of one climber who, unwilling to part with a laptop
computer and espresso machine, was basically dragged up and down the
mountain by Sherpa guides, the proficient locals who often pay the
price for clients' ineptitude.
Many extreme adventurers describe their activities as attempts to give
meaning to their directionless lives, to escape the numbing regularity
of everyday routine, or to seek a sense of spiritual grace; and we duly
sanction their willingness to jeopardize their lives (and the lives of
others) in the name of a higher purpose. Yet people who take personal
risks of a less spectacular, more unglamorous nature -- heavy smokers,
for example, or those who sniff at the idea of exercise -- tend to
receive the opposite treatment, portrayed as social outcasts in the
entertainment media and scare-mongering specimens in medical
journalism. And there's no cable channel called Extreme Pariahs.
Recognizing that double standard can help us understand the current
appeal of outlandish sports and survival movies. Despite our cosseted
lifestyles, after all, we're more obsessed by health concerns than ever
before. We're commanded to scrutinize nutrition labels with Talmudic
attention lest we fall prey to sugars, fats, cholesterol, or carbs.
We're urged to avoid alcohol, swallow dietary supplements, filter our
water, purify our air. Perhaps the appeal of extreme sport and survival
movies is linked to an implicit rejection of those imperatives -- to
the thrill of watching people bolder than ourselves decide "to hell
with it," throw off the shackles of their snug little lives, and assert
the right to risk everything for no rational reason at all.
At least occasionally, we all feel a need to reclaim our heritage as
sensation-seeking, risk-taking creatures -- vicariously if not in real,
physical terms. Movies like Touching the Void and Open Water give us
the best of both worlds: We get the thrilling frisson of watching
others come face to face with death, plus the tut-tutting "I told you
so" pleasure of seeing the foolhardy get their comeuppance. Extreme
schadenfreude, perhaps?
And why not? Schadenfreude, in one form or another, helps turn the
wheels of contemporary culture. What is the basis of capitalism but
institutionalized schadenfreude, making money at the expense of others?
What is the electoral system but the struggle to see one's own
candidates succeed and (crucially) the others fail? What is the drawing
power of spectator sports but the hope of watching "our" team win and
(again, crucially) the other one lose?
If schadenfreude is the reason for our fascination with spectacles of
the extreme, the sort of exploit favored by the late Graham Chapman of
the Monty Python comedy troupe -- whose membership in the Dangerous
Sports Club led him to downhill skiing in a Venetian gondola and hang
gliding over an Ecuadorean volcano -- could become even more of an
entertainment norm than it already is.
Or, conceivably, the pendulum may swing again, reviving the drowsy
satisfactions of banality. What's on the Miniature Golf Channel
tonight? How's that new IMAX movie about mowing the lawn?